It’s a linguistic convention to indicate suffixes with a hyphen (e.g.

” I corrected 29 cases of italics that should have been roman or vice versa, mostly in the book’s headings and subheadings. If a block of text is itself in italics, a word referred to should be in plain roman, as in “ The many descendants of Latin ille. In linguistics, as in normal typesetting, we use italics to indicate words that are being talked about rather than being used for their own meaning, whether in another language, as in “My favorite Spanish word is disfrutar” (which happens to be true), or in the text’s own language, as in “My favorite English word is salmon” (I just made that up). These corrections fixed errors that for the most part, were not present in my original manuscript, but were introduced during copy editing and typesetting. 170-71.Ī few dozen corrections had to do with typesetting conventions for talking about language. Based on Osten Dahl (1985), Tense and aspect systems, pp. But Catalan also uses the verb anar ‘to go’ to make a periphrastic past tense (instead of a future). Fortunately I was able to fix this easily, by adding the 2 words “Catalan and.”Ĭatalan and Spanish both have imperfect, simple past, present perfect, acabar de immediate past, progressive, and pluperfect. Having reread my original source, I now see that Catalan also has more major past tenses than Spanish, as shown below, though Spanish is still an outlier.

“Of the sixty-three other languages Dahl surveyed, only Kikuyu, a Bantu language of Africa with seven major TMA categories, surpassed Spanish.” Guess I shouldn’t have used the word “feminine.” The copy editor changed my original Española to Español, which I requested they change back to the feminine form Española. I meant “ se accidental,” not “ a personal.” La “ a personal”, una estructura que evita mencionar la persona que causó un accidente, también afecta el pensamiento. “Most Latin Americans use the two singular pronouns tú and usted and the plural pronoun vosotros.” Chances are nobody but me would ever had noticed it, but I had to make it right as a matter of academic integrity. (As my late sister used to say, “There’s a reason why they included the word mistake in the dictionary.”) The third was a doozy of a typesetting error, and the fourth was a genuine content error. I’m horrified that I made these goofs in the first place, and surprised that they made it as far as the proofs.

The first two were essentially “slips of the tongue” on my part - one in English and one in Spanish - that led to nonsensical text. Of my 166 corrections, only four of were “do or die.” That is, I can’t imagine the book being published with these errors uncorrected. The publisher will correct the proofs based on step #5 and add the index.However, I used it when creating the index.) (I also made a complete printout to work from, but found that the online version was easier to study closely. I read the proofs and entered my comments in the PDF, using Adobe’s commenting functionality.Taking into account this review, the publisher produced a typeset version of the entire book in a single PDF file.I reviewed the edits my job was to accept, reject, or comment on each one.

The publisher’s copy editing team edited each file, making comments using Word’s tracking functionality.I submitted my original manuscript in Microsoft Word, with one file per chapter.Proofreading is the fifth stage in book production. Leaving aside gory details having to do entirely with formatting, such as subsections accidentally being promoted to sections and vice versa, I made a total of 166 corrections to the proofs. Otherwise, you might be surprised at how many different types of problems can crop up along the road to publication. Those of you who have published a book yourself may find some points in common. It occurred to me that some aspects of the proofreading process might be interesting to my readers. The index is basically done but I want to hold onto it a little longer just in case I think of some improvements. A few days ago I finished proofreading and emailed back the corrected proofs. As I mentioned in my previous post, recently I have been immersed in correcting the proofs of my new book and creating an index for it.

Oxford dictionaries espanol